According to Kelley's Covariation Model, which factors are evaluated to form an attribution?

Kelley’s Covariation Model is a framework used to determine how individuals make attributions about the causes of behavior. According to this model, three key factors are assessed: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency.

Consensus refers to how others behave in similar situations; if many people react the same way, it suggests that the behavior may be situational rather than personal. Distinctiveness involves evaluating whether the behavior is unique to a particular situation or whether the individual behaves similarly across different contexts. Finally, consistency looks at whether the individual displays the same behavior over time in the same situation.

When these three factors are evaluated together, they help individuals determine the underlying causes of behavior, leading to more accurate attributions. This systematic evaluation is essential in social psychology, as it highlights how people interpret and understand the actions of themselves and others within various social contexts.

The other options do not correctly reflect Kelley's model or its components. The factors emphasized in option C are specifically the ones needed to assess the attribution effectively, making it the accurate choice.