According to Social Exchange Theory, how do people evaluate their relationships?

Social Exchange Theory posits that individuals assess their relationships by weighing the rewards against the costs involved. This approach emphasizes that people seek to maximize benefits while minimizing drawbacks in their social interactions. The concept suggests that the perceived value of a relationship is determined by the tangible and intangible benefits one receives (such as love, support, or acceptance) compared to the sacrifices or difficulties encountered (like conflict, time investment, or emotional distress).

When evaluating a relationship, a person will consider both the positive elements (rewards) and the negative aspects (costs) to determine if the relationship is favorable and worth maintaining. This cost-benefit analysis serves as the foundation for decisions about whether to continue, alter, or end a relationship, making option B the most accurate reflection of how relationships are evaluated according to Social Exchange Theory.

The other options do not encompass the comprehensive analysis of relationships that the theory describes. Emotional connection alone is only one aspect of a relationship, while comparisons to friends’ relationships or family expectations may influence decision-making but are not the central tenets of Social Exchange Theory.