What prevails when extrinsic motivations overshadow intrinsic motivations, according to the Overjustification Effect?

The Overjustification Effect describes a phenomenon where an individual’s intrinsic motivation to engage in an activity diminishes when they are given extrinsic rewards for that activity. When external incentives, such as money or praise, become more prominent than the internal satisfaction derived from the activity itself, individuals may start to view the activity primarily as a means to obtain those rewards, rather than for its own inherent enjoyment or value.

In this context, option B, which states there is a "Decreased recognition of intrinsic benefits," highlights a critical aspect of the Overjustification Effect. When extrinsic motivators overshadow intrinsic ones, individuals may overlook or undervalue the intrinsic rewards they would typically derive from the activity, such as personal satisfaction, creativity, or fulfillment. This shift in perception can lead to a reduced appreciation for the internal benefits that the activity may offer, ultimately resulting in less enjoyment and engagement in the activity when the extrinsic motivation is no longer present.

The other options do not align with the Overjustification Effect's implications, as they suggest outcomes such as increased enjoyment, enhanced performance, or a heightened recognition of intrinsic rewards, which contradict the primary idea that focusing on external rewards diminishes intrinsic motivation and enjoyment.