What would a proponent of Catharsis likely argue?

A proponent of Catharsis would argue that engaging in aggressive actions, even in a controlled or symbolic manner, can provide a positive outlet for pent-up feelings. The central belief behind this idea is that expressing aggression in some form allows individuals to release their frustrations and negative emotions, thereby reducing the likelihood of experiencing greater aggressive impulses later. This perspective is rooted in the psychological notion that if individuals are able to vent their anger through activities that channel aggression—such as sports, exercise, or even playing video games—they can achieve a sense of relief, which can help prevent progressively harmful behaviors in the future.

The other choices do not align with the Catharsis philosophy as effectively. Some may argue that expressing anger isn't beneficial and can indeed lead to more destructive outcomes, which contradicts the notion of cathartic release. Others emphasize the importance of repressed emotions being more beneficial, going against the core idea of needing to express emotions to maintain psychological balance or health. Lastly, the idea of discipline-based aggression does not directly relate to cathartic principles but rather touches on behavioral control which is outside the cathartic framework of emotional expression.