Which of the following best describes Insufficient Punishment?

Study for the UVA Social Psychology exam. Enhance your understanding with multiple choice questions that provide hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your test!

Insufficient punishment refers to a situation where a punishment is not strong enough to deter an undesired behavior, leading individuals to justify their actions internally. When individuals experience insufficient punishment, they often do not have enough external justification for their behavior to align with societal or personal standards. This lack of external justification can cause them to reformulate their beliefs or attitudes toward the behavior being punished, often resulting in a devaluation of that behavior.

For instance, if someone engages in a mild transgression and receives only a minor punishment, they might downplay the seriousness of that transgression to reconcile their self-image with the fact that they engaged in that behavior without facing significant consequences. This process implicates cognitive dissonance, as their behavior doesn't align with their self-perception or societal norms, leading to a shift in attitudes.

While the other options touch on aspects related to behaviors or attitudes, they do not accurately capture the essence of insufficient punishment. They include positive reinforcement or encouragement, which are not inherently connected to the concept of insufficient punishment and its implications related to justifications and attitudes.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy